Tag Archives: Financial Times

Dow Jones board will get sued no matter what

by

Joshua Chaffin of The Financial Times writes for Tuesday’s paper that the Dow Jones & Co. board of directors could be put in a precarious position if the Bancroft family that controls the company eschews News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch‘s $5 billion bid for the company for a lower bid that guarantees editorial independence of The Wall Street Journal.

Financial TimesChaffin wrote, “‘They’re going to get sued no matter what they do,’ said Nell Minow, editor of the Corporate Library. ‘The question is whether the litigation will have merit.’

“Under Delaware law, the board is obliged to seek the best price available once it decides to sell the company. It has been sidelined for the moment by the Bancroft family, which controls 64 per cent of Dow Jones voting shares and rejected the first offer from Mr Murdoch’s News Corp in early May.

“The Bancrofts have since softened their stance, and are now trying to agree with Mr Murdoch on safeguards that would protect the editorial independence of the Wall Street Journal in the event of a sale.

“If the Bancrofts and Mr Murdoch can resolve that issue, then the board’s work would be straightforward. At that point, they would begin negotiations to try to extract the highest price.

“Things would become more complicated, though, if another, lower bid were to emerge from a suitor that the Bancrofts found more palatable. There is legal precedent for the board to recommend a lower offer if they can prove it is in the company’s strategic interest. They may also have more lee-way if an offer includes shares as opposed to pure cash.”

Read more here.

Analyst: WSJ would shutter European editions, FT to end U.S. edition if deal

by

A Dow Jones Newswires story about the the possibility of the parent company of the Financial Times and GE, the parent of business news cable network CNBC, joining together to purchase Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, quotes analysts as saying foreign editions of the papers would close under such a deal.

Dow JonesThe story stated, “A venture with GE and Pearson would create a global business news and financial information giant, with assets including the Journal, the FT and CNBC, as well as Barron’s, MarketWatch, Dow’s wire service and 50% of the Economist magazine. It would also include interests in business newspapers in Russia, France, South Africa and India, as well as leading stock indexes in both the U.S. and the United Kingdom.

“A merger between Pearson and Dow Jones ‘would create significant synergies with the WSJ being able to shut down its European and Asian editions and the FT shutting down in the U.S.,’ said Polo Tang, a UBS analyst who covers Pearson, in a report. ‘It would also provide a unique global platform for advertisers.’

“Tang said he thinks antitrust concerns arising from a combination of the only two global business newspapers would be minimal because Pearson and Dow Jones reportedly held talks three years ago about a possible merger. The prospects for that deal were damaged not by concerns over antitrust issues but by disagreements over control.

“It also depends on how regulators define the market and whether they would look at the entire newspaper landscape globally instead of focusing on business publications, Tang said.”

Read more here. 

GE/Pearson bid for Dow Jones makes no sense journalistically

by

Jonathan Berr writes on BloggingStocks.com that the talk about GE subsidiary CNBC and Pearson subsidiary The Financial Times teaming up to make a bid for Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, makes no sense financially or from a journalistic point of view.

Berr wrote, “Moreover, this would be a bear to manage. Running a news operation is like herding cats on a good day. Running three organizations (CNBC, The Journal and the FT) each competing for the same audience and the same stories would be Byzantine in complexity. There also would be epic bureaucratic turf wars since both companies would have equal say in managing the company. I suspect allowing the Bancrofts to continue to have a say the venture’s affairs would create an additional set of headaches.

“Since it’s obvious that the GE-Pearson deal won’t happen, why are people still trying to talk it up? My hunch is that the chatter is coming from across the Atlantic. Pearson is under pressure from its shareholders to dump the FT and focus on higher-growth businesses such as textbooks. General Electric would probably be keen on the idea of having Dow Jones as a buffer against the nascent Fox Business Channel.

“Regardless, Dow Jones is just a business to both companies. For Murdoch, it’s an object of lust. At the end of the day, emotion will trump logic.”

Read more here.

Pearson/GE bid for Dow Jones could lead to layoffs

by

A joint bid by the parent companies of The Financial Times and business news cable network CNBC for Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, might not be better for business journalists than the News Corp. offer, writes Richard Perez-Pena of The New York Times.

Wall Street JournalPerez-Pena wrote, “But a person with knowledge of the Pearson-G.E. talks noted that a deal with those companies might not be to the journalists’ liking, either, because it offers more opportunities to cut jobs by eliminating overlapping functions. The Financial Times, The Journal, the newswires and CNBC often have reporters and editors doing much the same work — in some cases, in bureaus in Asia and Europe that are expensive to run.

“In addition to the strategic advantages of joining forces with Dow Jones and The Journal — two of the most respected names in business journalism — a deal would have defensive value for Pearson and G.E. The News Corporation plans to start a business news channel on cable to compete with CNBC, and analysts predict that Mr. Murdoch would try to use The Journal to crush The Financial Times, its much smaller rival.”

Read more here.

Why the FT is increasing its newsstand price

by

Ian Burrell of The Independent newspaper in London interviews Financial Times chief executive John Ridding about why the business newspaper is increasing its newsstand price, and the conversation touched on the quality of the journalism

John RiddingBurrell wrote, “‘We have invested steadily, building a global operation with bureaux and reporters and editing operations around the world. That has given us a 24-hour rolling news operation with hubs here, in the homeland, and in New York and in Hong Kong,’ says Ridding. ‘We do that because our audience has become increasingly global, and, frankly, our readers demand quality news and analysis wherever it happens.’

“If the audience is going to make such demands then they should pay for the service. ‘Sustained quality journalism on a global level does actually require sustained investment and I’m a strong believer that quality journalism is valuable stuff.’

“As he looks across at the takeaway coffee cup on his desk, the FT CEO makes the case that other print products could also argue they are sold too cheaply. ‘Quality journalism is undervalued. People are making decisions and forming views – this is the information age after all. Quality, independent, accurate information is valuable stuff. I’ve got my Starbucks over there and it’s a lot more expensive than newspapers and magazines.’”

Read more here.

GE, Pearson discussing bid for Dow Jones

by

News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch may yet have a competing bid for Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, according to a story for Monday’s Journal.

Wall Street JournalSarah Ellison, Dennis Berman and Kathryn Kranhold wrote, “General Electric Co. and Financial Times publisher Pearson PLC are in talks about making a joint bid for Dow Jones that would allow the family to keep a minority interest.

“Under one scenario that has been discussed, GE’s CNBC business channel, the Financial Times and Dow Jones would be combined into a privately held joint venture, according to people familiar with the matter. The venture would be owned in equal parts by GE and Pearson, with the Bancroft family holding a minority stake.”

The Journal also reported that one family member said the Bancrofts have agreed they would give serious consideration to an offer that was lower than the $60 per share on offer from News Corp if they felt the buyer could better protect the Wall Street Journal’s integrity.

Read more here. A subscription is required.

Financial Times parent seeks partners to make Dow Jones bid

by

The parent company of The Financial Times is looking for partners to make a bid for Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, according to a story by Dennis Berman and Sarah Ellison on The Journal’s web site.

They wrote, “On paper, at least, Pearson and Dow Jones appear a viable combination, with the two complementing each other geographically. The Financial Times is strong in Europe and less so in the U.S.; The Wall Street Journal, meanwhile, is America’s leading business publication by circulation, with a smaller presence overseas. One advantage of a Pearson-Dow Jones combination could be substantial cost-savings for the two companies.

“Indeed, about three years ago, Dow Jones and Pearson had extensive discussions about a joint-operating agreement to combine the two publications’ operations in Europe and Asia, according to two people familiar with the matter. These talks eventually broke down.

“The question for Pearson is just how to fund a deal to rival News Corp.’s $60-a-share proposal. While the London-based Pearson sits on a $13.6 billion market capitalization, News Corp.’s offer values Dow Jones at about 40 times the company’s 2007 earnings. Anticipated earnings at Pearson, which also publishes educational textbooks, and the Penguin book imprint, are valued at less than half that figure. That suggests a highly-dilutive acquisition that would weigh on Pearson’s shares.”

Read more here.

Financial Times also raises newsstand price

by

Following on the heels of The Wall Street Journal’s decision to raise its newsstand price, The Financial Times will do the same, reports Andrew Clark from The Guardian newspaper in London.

Clark wrote, “Already the most expensive dailies on newsagents’ shelves, the two papers are banking on publishing industry wisdom that readers will continue to stump up for specialist content even in an era of free-of-charge news on the internet.”

Financial TimesLater, he added, “In April, the FT redesigned its content under the slogan ‘we live in financial times’. Changes included a fresh typeface, an extra foreign news page and more features-style content in its Companies & Markets section.

“An FT spokeswoman said the cover price increase was the first for five years: ‘We have improved our content and design and successfully built a global operation with the world’s best journalists and editors. The price increase reflects these investments, which give our readers the quality international news and analysis they require.’”

Read more here.

Bancroft proposal to Murdoch on Wednesday

by

Joshua Chaffin and Aline van Duyn of The Financial Times write for Wednesday’s paper that the Bancroft family was putting the finishing touches on its proposal to News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch for a board that would keep him from interfering with the journalism at The Wall Street Journal if they sell its parent company, Dow Jones & Co., to him.

Financial TimesChaffin and van Duyn wrote, “Family members, working with their lawyers and financial advisers, were expected to send the proposal to Mr Murdoch on Wednesday, pushing forward negotiations with News Corp over its $5bn offer.

“However, people familiar with the matter suggested that the negotiations between the two parties over editorial controls could drag on for some time.”

Later, they added, “The Bancrofts have taken a dim view of the editorial board at the Times of London, another News Corp paper which Mr Murdoch has offered as a model for the Journal, according to several people familiar with the family. These people suggested that any proposal would have to be designed to ensure that board members or other parties felt obligated to act and seek remedies if the paper’s values were being compromised.”

Read more here.

Murdoch looks to Thomson for advice

by

Aaron Patrick of The Wall Street Journal profiles Robert Thomson, the editor of The Times of London, who is advising News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch in his bid to acquire Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Journal, for $5 billion.

Robert ThomsonPatrick wrote, “The Financial Times’s foreign editor at the time, Andrew Gowers, hired Mr. Thomson as his No. 2 in 1994. Mr. Thomson rose through the editing ranks and, four years later, was named managing editor of the paper’s U.S. edition. His role: carve a bigger, more visible role for the FT in a market dominated by The Wall Street Journal. The FT’s circulation in the U.S. was just 45,000 copies a day, a spokeswoman for Mr. Thomson said. Mr. Thomson thought he could attract new, wealthy readers by publishing more international business news. By 2002, U.S. circulation had increased to 150,000 copies, though still far behind the Journal’s 1.7 million.

“In 2001, the editor’s job at the Financial Times opened up. Mr. Gowers, who was more experienced at the FT, got the job, a deep disappointment to Mr. Thomson, according to people who know him.

“A few months later, Mr. Gowers flew to New York to check on the paper’s operations. Mr. Thomson, who had become acquainted with a variety of media executives during his time in New York, organized a get-to-know-you lunch at News Corp.’s headquarters for Mr. Gowers with Mr. Murdoch, his son Lachlan and a few others. To the surprise of Mr. Gowers, Mr. Thomson and Mr. Murdoch started joking around, said Mr. Gowers, now head of corporate communications, advertising and brand and marketing strategy for Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in Europe.”

Read more here.